Der US-Technologiekonzern Apple will einem Bericht der Zeitung “The Oregonian” ein neues Rechenzentrum in Prineville im US-Bundesstaat Oregon bauen. Das Projekt soll unter dem Namen Maverick laufen und im Dezember soll entschieden werden, ob das Rechenzentrum tatsächlich gebaut wird oder nicht. Es sei eine Anlage mit 31 Megawatt Leistung gebaut, die sich auf eine Fläche von 647.488 Quadratmetern befinden soll. Die Steuervergünstigungen, die niedrigen Energiekosten und das milde Klima sollen für den Standort sprechen.
[Weiterlesen...]
Apple
Apple – Neues Rechenzentrum geplant
Dezember 6, 2011
Apple iPad beherrscht Tablet-Markt
Oktober 13, 2011
Das Tablet Apple iPad ist nach einem Bericht der Webseite AppleInsider basierend auf einer Studie der Marktforschungsfirma Comscore für 46,8 Prozent des Online-Traffics verantwortlich. Das Apple iPhone hat einen Anteil von 42,6 Prozent am Webtraffic. In den USA kommen 7 Prozent den Zahlen zufolge durch iOS-Geräte zustande und zwar werden entweder Nachrichten gelesen oder der eigene Status in sozialen Netzwerken aktualisiert. Die Tablets mit dem Betriebssystem Google Android scheinen auf dem US-Markt nur eine geringe Rolle zu spielen.
[Weiterlesen...]
Bug found on the new iPod Nano
September 18, 2007
I could not resist, having video on an iPod the size of the new Nano was just too tempting…so I got one. As soon as I connected it to iTunes, it prompted me to install the software update that was made available a couple of days ago, after that it synced music & videos, and off I went.
Much to my surprise, this afternoon it started behaving erratically – whenever I pressed the fast forward or rewind buttons, the iPod would keep skipping in the same direction until either the end or the start of the song was reached respectively. One annoying thing is that the skip steps are much bigger than on the previous Nano, and so it makes the process less accurate. Combined with this bug, it’s unusable. The only way to stop it is to pause, and resume playback, and since the steps are so large, it’s a hit-and-miss proposition.
Here is a short video showing the behavior.
The E on the iPhone does not necessarily indicate EDGE coverage
September 18, 2007
It actually indicates GPRS attachment status, the capability (or lack thereof) of sending and receiving data, be it over plain old GPRS, or the faster EDGE. I was going to comment on the original Engadget blog post, but after seeing a few pages of comments already, I doubt they would have noticed it. This is where they get it wrong:
You’ll notice the iTunes WiFi Store icon, and an O2-UK network symbol up top. If you look carefully, you’ll see that the E logo for EDGE is missing: we guess that 30% network coverage on O2 don’t quite stretch inside the Apple Store.
A bit further down, they mention this again:
O2 iPhone on the left, unlocked US iPhone on the right (running on T-Mobile’s UK network). Note that the O2 iPhone doesn’t show the EDGE logo, but the unlocked phone on T-Mobile does. You can probably guess at what we’re getting at here: O2’s EDGE coverage sucks.
In this particular side-by-side photo, T-Mobile’s coverage is marginally lower than O2’s, but they should both be capable of sending GPRS traffic. Another reason they get this wrong is that the waves icon ‘overwrites’ the E symbol while the iPhone is connected to a WiFi network, so you could still have GPRS/EDGE attachment in the background, so-to-speak. In my particular case, the iPhone is happily registered on Vodafone Spain, and is attached to GPRS (no EDGE here at all), showing the E while I’m not in range of WiFi.
The iPhone also does something very clever – when you open an application that requires a data connection, it will start a GPRS attach and session, while it asks you if you want to join any of the nearby WiFi networks (if any). In case you say no, the alternative data connection is already established, cutting down on extra waiting time before you start seeing content on your screen. This may seem stupid to Europeans, by default stuck with hugely expensive pay-as-you-go data (50 Euro cents per 250kB!!), but with the original AT&T voice + data plan, it does not really matter.
O2 must be crazy
September 17, 2007
And Telefonica, who owns them, just as much. If the rumors are true, they will be surrendering around 40% of revenue (not profit, revenue) from each client using an iPhone, in exchange for an exclusive distribution deal in the UK. What is going to be the likely problem for end users here? Traditionally, when you buy a phone in Europe that is tied to a contract, you have to sign the papers before you can even smell the phone, and thus are bound by the terms. In the US, you can just buy the phone at the store, take it home, and get the contract set up with AT&T through iTunes there while sipping a coffee.
Unlocking your $400 iPhone is now possible, and so you’re no longer bound by an AT&T contract. In Europe, however, you may be able to unlock the phone just the same, but you will have to stay with the contract or pay the cancellation fee. Either way, operators stand to have better deal than AT&T.
Apple is against Bluetooth, but why?
September 14, 2007
First day with my shiny new iPhone, unlocked to work on Vodafone’s network – so far so good, pretty much loving it. Until I looked at the Bluetooth specs. Basically, this thing is only useful for mono headsets and carkits, and that’s it.
The iPhone has been certified under Bluetooth 2.0 + EDR, as can be seen in the BQB documents, but the PICS detail only handset and audio gateway profiles, with required signaling profiles such as RFCOMM, pretty much the bare minimum for a working Bluetooth hands-free system. What about the ton of other profiles, for example, A2DP, FTP, DUN…? Not included. The iPhone uses a CSR BlueCore4 Audioflash, which has 6MB of onboard FLASH memory, and could be upgraded provided that there is a host controller with access to the SPI port on the BC4. It seems that the iPhone uses Open Interface’s BLUEmagic 3.0 stack [PDF], which would imply an external host controller.
Now I’m starting to get confused – you usually choose a FLASH BlueCore if you intend to run software on it, be it CSR’s own stack, or a customized version of it. If you intend to use a host-based system, where the stack is handled by an external processor, you can buy way cheaper BlueCore ROM chips – and we’re talking between $1 and $3 a piece in savings. This may not seem much, but when multiplied it by Apple’s sales, you have a hefty sum. Below is a graphic that illustrates the differences between a host-based HCI system (left) and a standalone or ROM implementation (right):
The big question still is – why is Apple so Bluetooth-unfriendly? Did they have certification problems and rushed through the bare minimum specs to claim Bluetooth compatibility? This seems strange as the iPhone was certified by CETECOM, which probably is the most experienced lab on Bluetooth certification in the world. Same applies to MacBooks and Mac Pros, they feature a few more profiles like FTP, but not A2DP. Hoping for a firmware update to fix this mess, over and out.
Apple to offer all-you-can-eat subscriptions to iTunes?
Juli 2, 2007
Looking at how Universal Music Group has decided not to renew their contract with the iTunes music store (which is by the way the third largest music retailer in the U.S., not just online, but globally!), I predict two things will happen:
- Apple will offer a subscription-based model, where you pay a weekly or monthly fee, and can download as much as you want from their catalog. Right now, iTunes imposes the price they buy their music at, and it has been patently obvious that many labels were not at all happy with the $0.99 a song pricing scheme.
- UMG will see their music pirated like no other label. If people cannot even get their music from a convenient and easy to use source, for a one-could-argue reasonable price, they will find ways to get it from other sources. There are alternatives to piracy, such as MP3Search.ru, which provide songs at $0.19 a piece, DRM-free, and they have a very extensive repertoire (albeit sometimes not as complete as iTunes’).
Will this prediction come true? It depends on how much it would hurt iTunes to lose Universal, and I think it would hurt a lot.