<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Technik News &#187; O2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.technik-news.de/category/o2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.technik-news.de</link>
	<description>Technology Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 09:34:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The E on the iPhone does not necessarily indicate EDGE coverage</title>
		<link>http://www.technik-news.de/2007/09/18/the-e-on-the-iphone-does-not-necessarily-indicate-edge-coverage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technik-news.de/2007/09/18/the-e-on-the-iphone-does-not-necessarily-indicate-edge-coverage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 07:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Engadget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[O2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WiFi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.am/?p=361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It actually indicates GPRS attachment status, the capability (or lack thereof) of sending and receiving data, be it over plain old GPRS, or the faster EDGE. I was going to comment on the original Engadget blog post, but after seeing a few pages of comments already, I doubt they would have noticed it. This is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It actually indicates GPRS attachment status, the capability (or lack thereof) of sending and receiving data, be it over plain old GPRS, or the faster EDGE. I was going to comment <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/18/hands-on-with-the-o2-iphone/" target="_blank">on the original Engadget blog post</a>, but after seeing a few pages of comments already, I doubt they would have noticed it. This is where they get it wrong:</p>
<blockquote><p>You’ll notice the iTunes WiFi Store icon, and an O2-UK network symbol up top. If you look carefully, you’ll see that the E logo for EDGE is missing: we guess that 30% network coverage on O2 don’t quite stretch inside the Apple Store.</p></blockquote>
<p>A bit further down, they mention this again:</p>
<blockquote><p>O2 iPhone on the left, unlocked US iPhone on the right (running on T-Mobile’s UK network). Note that the O2 iPhone doesn’t show the EDGE logo, but the unlocked phone on T-Mobile does. You can probably guess at what we’re getting at here: O2’s EDGE coverage sucks.</p></blockquote>
<p>In this particular side-by-side photo, T-Mobile’s coverage is marginally lower than O2’s, but they should both be capable of sending GPRS traffic. Another reason they get this wrong is that the waves icon ‘overwrites’ the E symbol while the iPhone is connected to a WiFi network, so you could still have GPRS/EDGE attachment in the background, so-to-speak. In my particular case, the iPhone is happily registered on Vodafone Spain, and is attached to GPRS (no EDGE here at all), showing the E while I’m not in range of WiFi.</p>
<p>The iPhone also does something very clever &#8211; when you open an application that requires a data connection, it will start a GPRS attach and session, while it asks you if you want to join any of the nearby WiFi networks (if any). In case you say no, the alternative data connection is already established, cutting down on extra waiting time before you start seeing content on your screen. This may seem stupid to Europeans, by default stuck with hugely expensive pay-as-you-go data (50 Euro cents per 250kB!!), but with the original AT&amp;T voice + data plan, it does not really matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technik-news.de/2007/09/18/the-e-on-the-iphone-does-not-necessarily-indicate-edge-coverage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>O2 must be crazy</title>
		<link>http://www.technik-news.de/2007/09/17/o2-must-be-crazy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technik-news.de/2007/09/17/o2-must-be-crazy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 07:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[O2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telefonica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.am/?p=358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And Telefonica, who owns them, just as much. If the rumors are true, they will be surrendering around 40% of revenue (not profit, revenue) from each client using an iPhone, in exchange for an exclusive distribution deal in the UK. What is going to be the likely problem for end users here? Traditionally, when you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And Telefonica, who owns them, just as much. If the rumors are true, they will be surrendering around 40% of revenue (not profit, revenue) from each client using an iPhone, in exchange for an exclusive distribution deal in the UK. What is going to be the likely problem for end users here? Traditionally, when you buy a phone in Europe that is tied to a contract, you have to sign the papers before you can even smell the phone, and thus are bound by the terms. In the US, you can just buy the phone at the store, take it home, and get the contract set up with AT&amp;T through iTunes there while sipping a coffee.</p>
<p>Unlocking your $400 iPhone is now possible, and so you’re no longer bound by an AT&amp;T contract. In Europe, however, you may be able to unlock the phone just the same, but you will have to stay with the contract or pay the cancellation fee. Either way, operators stand to have better deal than AT&amp;T.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technik-news.de/2007/09/17/o2-must-be-crazy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
